(Sex) education??… no thanks!

Friday, April 25, 2008 by clandestine observer

What’s with this brouhaha regarding sex education? Sure there are many nutcases including many of the political leaders who believe that sex is ‘natural, something we come to know automatically.And animals don’t get sex education so why should we??’ /*like the hand of god will guide us all!!!!!!*/ WTF!!! Animals don’t have a complex social structure, misguiding media and to top it all- RAGING HARMONES =tons of possibilities to get in trouble!!! So what the hell are these people talking about???

For them HIV/AIDS, sex education, obscenity, remix videos, IPL cheerleaders gets mapped so a single cerebral lobe Some even believe that it will encourage teenagers to indulge in ‘it’, but sex education is primarily focused on answering ‘what’s what ‘and ‘what’s happening with you all’ kind of questions, it informs them of the additional responsibilities and consequences.

The anti-sex education camp also thinks that talks about birds and bees should be left to the members of the family, Ok! But most of the times the actual Norman cloture of the anatomy will be substituted by ‘that’, ‘it’ etc /*shivers down my spine*/ I can imagine the look they’ll have on their faces- even digging your nose and sticking the bogger back in will be less embarrassing.

The generation is different, they are more curious, more confused. If they hear,” Hum tum ek kamre mein bandh ho…”, they’ll probably ask ,”Usse kya hoga??”.

With the advent of the internet, few clicks are enough for Jenna Jameson to showcase her talents. Sex education is the need of the day, teenagers have a right to know what’s happening with their bodies and about PMS aka the mad cow disease. It’s the time they are becoming adults, atleast physiologically.

Let’s make a list of pros and cons of implementing sex education in schools

Pros:-

- Focus on personal hygiene.

- Better sexual health.

- More knowledge and a clearer outlook.

- Lesser amount of stress.

Cons

- Talking about ‘it’.

Sex Education needs to be inducted in the current syllabus considering it will be the only subject most closely connected with the real world!

So I call all the moral police /*which r many*/ like the BJP, Shratrughan Sinha/*who’s not jealous of Amitabh Bachchanan btw-hahahahahaa*/, the Bajrang Dal/*don’t have any idea regarding what other activism they indulge in*/ and dearest Mrs. Pratibha Naitthani/*who should keep herself more busy for everybody's sake*/ and all other puritans to start googling for inhibited places so they can form a new world order /*and bring back the dark ages*/. Sometimes we start believing that this world is perfect, but thanks to people mentioned above, we know we are wrong.

2 comments:

Rutesh said...

first and foremost a very important topic.

ur blog is perhaps an attempt to justify sex education without touching the real issues involved.

its a good blog, but while u seem so hell bent on the implementation of sex education that u forget the various issues surrounding it. say for instance, the age when kids would be taught this. the age has gotta be fairly correct. a bit earlier, and then they might not understand the importance of it..a bit late..and well..it would be jst like no sex education at all.

so the age when kids are taught is to be correct. then comes the syllabus, administering of it. then the teachers, do we have the same school teachers or specially trained teachers? if they're the same teachers who teach regular stuff, then its k, but if its specially trained teachers, then hiring them would push up education costs, wouldnt that increase the already sky-rocketing education costs?

if that makes education expensive, then will it achieve what it will have set out to, cos it might keep the poor out of the school due to shooting costs.

or do we have a completely different school for this one? this sounds very ludicrous but, which one?

will this sex education be subjected to marking system as other subjects are? if not, then how do we know whether or not the students have learned anything?

look, these are jst basic elementary issues that i thght at the top of my head. if i, or for that matter had u as well, put some more thght into this..we'll find out that there are a lot no. of things that have to be considered!

what is however, perhaps arguably, accepted is that there is a need for it. the opponents of this drive are definitely not people who can think ahead and beyond their own ideas of sex. sex to them is what they did when their wives bore the fruits of their labour. and then, they lived happily ever after. we all know its a lot more different than that.

its one thing to have a scheme which everyone sees as foolproof and a workable alternative in taxing times, but completely another to actually be able to formulate, codify, de-codify,implement and then assimilate it into the current order of things.

clandestine observer said...

thx fr reading & posting your comment.
bt dude! the time when they will introduce it IS right coz grls hit puberty earlier than us boys thus introducing them to SE in the 9th and 10th STD is a very good idea, may be even from 8th.

abt the cost of education, there are NGOs that are more than willing to undertake it.

a written exam fr it is definitely not necessary, they can have a group discussion at the end.
it could be a 2days program after/during school. so even if some1 dosent understand something, tht person can always consult their frnds who know!

it can implemented in stages,...........

have tons of ideas but hey i m not the education minister or his adviser!

wish i was getting paid fr such advises!